US-Regierung plant lebenslängliche Haft für Terror-Verdächtige / US-Administration: Plan To Jail Terror Suspects for Life
Zwei Artikel und ein Kommentar / Two Articels and a Comment
Am 2. Januar 2005 berichtete die "Washington Post" erstmals von Plänen des Pentagon, wonach Personen, die terroristischer Aktivitäten beschuldigt werden, ohne dass es dafür irgendwelche Beweise gibt, ohne Gerichtsverfahren lebenslänglich weggesperrt werden können. Die Aufregung über diesen an sich ungeheuerlichen Plan (der nicht weniger ungeheurelich wäre, wenn es sich nur um ein Gedankenspiel handelte) hielt sich sowohl in der US-Öffentlichkeit als auch hier zu Lande in Grenzen. "Vielleicht überraschen derartige Enthüllungen einfach nicht mehr", schreibt Konrad Ege in einem Kommentar für die Wochenzeitung Freitag, wo man von Bush, Rumsfeld und Co. doch schon allerhand gewohnt ist! Der Vorgang ist dennoch bezeichnend für die Ungeniertheit, mit der die neokonservativen Kräfte in den USA ihr Demokratie-Abbauprogramm umzusetzen gewillt sind. Demokratie und Rechtstaatlichkeit sind die Opfer, welche die Gesellschaft an der Heimatfront aufzubringen haben, damit die USA ihren "Krieg gegen den Terror" in aller Welt führen können.
Wir dokumentieren im Folgenden den schon erwähnten Kommentar von Konrad Ege sowie Auszüge aus zwei Artikeln aus der Washington Post vom 2. und 3. Januar 2005 (letztere nur englisch).
Bei Verdacht lebenslänglich
George Walker Bush, der Revolutionär
Von Konrad Ege
Vielleicht wegen der Katastrophe in Südasien, vielleicht wegen der Feiertage: Erneute Enthüllungen über Folter - unter anderem brennende Zigaretten in den Ohren - im US-Stützpunkt Guantanamo und im Irak, und über Pläne im Pentagon, verdächtigte Terroristen ohne Gerichtsverfahren lebenslänglich wegzusperren, haben in den USA die Gemüter nur minimal erregt. Vielleicht überraschen derartige Enthüllungen einfach nicht mehr: Hat Präsident Bush doch seinen Rechtsberater Alberto Gonzalez als Justizminister nominiert, den intellektuellen Autoren der These, die Genfer Konvention sei im Zeitalter des Terrorismus überholt.
Dem Bürgerrechtsverband American Civil Liberties Union zugängliche Dokumente enthalten Berichte von FBI-Beamten über schwere Misshandlung in Guantanamo. Sie hätten in "fötaler Position" angekettete Männer vorgefunden. Die Häftlinge seien wohl "18, 24 Stunden oder länger" angekettet gewesen und hätten sich selber beschmutzt, weil man ihnen den Toilettengang verweigert habe. Ein Häftling sei in einem völlig überhitzten Raum fast bewusstlos vorgefunden worden. FBI-Beamte beschwerten sich, dass die militärischen Verhörer vorgaben, FBI-Beamte zu sein, um ihre Verantwortung zu verleugnen. Ein hochrangiger FBI-Mann in Bagdad erwähnte eine Executive Order des Präsidenten über Druckmittel gegen Häftlingen durch Schafentzug und ähnliche Methoden. Das Weiße Haus bestreitet die Existenz einer solchen Direktive. Und das Justizministerium erklärt ein Papier des eigenen Hauses aus dem Jahre 2002 für überholt, wonach Folter nur Folter sei, wenn sie Schmerzen erzeuge, die "in ihrer Intensität vergleichbar (sind) mit Schmerzen, die durch eine schwere Verletzung hervorgerufen werden, wie etwa Organversagen, die Beeinträchtigung von Körperfunktionen oder auch der Tod".
Die Washington Post berichtet am 2. Januar, Vertreter der CIA und des Verteidigungsministeriums hätten dem Weißen Haus Pläne für den langfristigen Umgang mit inhaftierten mutmaßlichen Terroristen vorgelegt, die schlimmster Taten und Pläne verdächtigt würden, für deren Verurteilung aber keine prozesstauglichen Informationen vorlägen. Die Betroffenen sollten ohne Verfahren lebenslänglich eingesperrt werden, in Guantanamo in einem weiteren 200-Insassen-Gefängnis, möglicherweise auch in eigens zu bauenden Anstalten in Saudi-Arabien, Jemen oder Afghanistan.
Time Magazine hat George W. Bush gerade zur "Persönlichkeit des Jahres 2004" gekürt; der Präsident habe es geschafft, "die Realität so zu deuten, dass sie seinen Plänen entspricht, und sein Schicksal - und das Amerikas - von seinem Glauben an die Kraft seiner Führung" abhängig zu machen. Time fragte Bush, ob er in der zweiten Amtszeit seine Machtposition konsolidieren wolle. Nein, meinte Bush - laut Time ein "amerikanischer Revolutionär" - er habe doch schon "all die Macht" die er brauche.
Aus: Freitag 01, 7. Januar 2005
Long-Term Plan Sought For Terror Suspects
By Dana Priest (Excerpts)
Administration officials are preparing long-range plans for indefinitely imprisoning suspected terrorists whom they do not want to set free or turn over to courts in the United States or other countries, according to intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials.
The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for potentially lifetime detentions, including for hundreds of people now in military and CIA custody whom the government does not have enough evidence to charge in courts. The outcome of the review, which also involves the State Department, would also affect those expected to be captured in the course of future counterterrorism operations.
"We've been operating in the moment because that's what has been required," said a senior administration official involved in the discussions, who said the current detention system has strained relations between the United States and other countries. "Now we can take a breath. We have the ability and need to look at long-term solutions."
One proposal under review is the transfer of large numbers of Afghan, Saudi and Yemeni detainees from the military's Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention center into new U.S.-built prisons in their home countries. The prisons would be operated by those countries, but the State Department, where this idea originated, would ask them to abide by recognized human rights standards and would monitor compliance, the senior administration official said.
As part of a solution, the Defense Department, which holds 500 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, plans to ask Congress for $25 million to build a 200-bed prison to hold detainees who are unlikely to ever go through a military tribunal for lack of evidence, according to defense officials.
The new prison, dubbed Camp 6, would allow inmates more comfort and freedom than they have now, and would be designed for prisoners the government believes have no more intelligence to share, the officials said. It would be modeled on a U.S. prison and would allow socializing among inmates.
"Since global war on terror is a long-term effort, it makes sense for us to be looking at solutions for long-term problems," said Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman. (...)
Little is known about the CIA's captives, the conditions under which they are kept -- or the procedures used to decide how long they are held or when they may be freed. That has prompted criticism from human rights groups, and from some in Congress and the administration, who say the lack of scrutiny or oversight creates an unacceptable risk of abuse.
Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), vice chairman of the House intelligence committee who has received classified briefings on the CIA's detainees and interrogation methods, said that given the long-term nature of the detention situation, "I think there should be a public debate about whether the entire system should be secret.
"The details about the system may need to remain secret," Harman said. At the least, she said, detainees should be registered so that their treatment can be tracked and monitored within the government. "This is complicated. We don't want to set up a bureaucracy that ends up making it impossible to protect sources and informants who operate within the groups we want to penetrate."
The CIA is believed to be holding fewer than three dozen al Qaeda leaders in prison. The agency holds most, if not all, of the top captured al Qaeda leaders, including Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, Abu Zubaida and the lead Southeast Asia terrorist, Nurjaman Riduan Isamuddin, known as Hambali.
(...)
One approach used by the CIA has been to transfer captives it picks up abroad to third countries willing to hold them indefinitely and without public proceedings. The transfers, called "renditions," depend on arrangements between the United States and other countries, such as Egypt, Jordan and Afghanistan, that agree to have local security services hold certain terror suspects in their facilities for interrogation by CIA and foreign liaison officers.
The practice has been criticized by civil liberties groups and others, who point out that some of the countries have human rights records that are criticized by the State Department in annual reports.
Renditions originated in the 1990s as a way of picking up criminals abroad, such as drug kingpins, and delivering them to courts in the United States or other countries. Since 2001, the practice has been used to make certain detainees do not go to court or go back on the streets, officials said.
"The whole idea has become a corruption of renditions," said one CIA officer who has been involved in the practice. "It's not rendering to justice, it's kidnapping."
But top intelligence officials and other experts, including former CIA director George J. Tenet in his testimony before Congress, say renditions are an effective method of disrupting terrorist cells and persuading detainees to reveal information.
"Renditions are the most effective way to hold people," said Rohan Gunaratna, author of "Inside al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror." "The threat of sending someone to one of these countries is very important. In Europe, the custodial interrogations have yielded almost nothing" because they do not use the threat of sending detainees to a country where they are likely to be tortured.
Washington Post
Sunday, January 2, 2005
Lugar Condemns Plan To Jail Detainees for Life (Excerpts)
A leading Republican senator yesterday condemned as "a bad idea" a reported U.S. plan to keep some suspected terrorists imprisoned for a lifetime even if the government lacks evidence to charge them.
The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for those it is unwilling to set free or turn over to U.S. or foreign courts, The Washington Post said in a report yesterday that cited intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials.
Some detentions could potentially last a lifetime, the report said. Influential senators denounced the idea as probably unconstitutional.
"It's a bad idea. So we ought to get over it and we ought to have a very careful, constitutional look at this," Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on "Fox News Sunday."
Sen. Carl M. Levin (Mich.), senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, cited earlier U.S. Supreme Court decisions. "There must be some modicum, some semblance of due process . . . if you're going to detain people, whether it's for life or whether it's for years," Levin said, also on Fox.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (...)
Wahington Post
Monday, January 3, 2005
Zurück zur "USA-Seite"
Zur "USA-Seite" (Gesamtverzeichnis)
Zur Menschenrechts-Seite
Zurück zur Homepage