Dieser Internet-Auftritt kann nach dem Tod des Webmasters, Peter Strutynski, bis auf Weiteres nicht aktualisiert werden. Er steht jedoch weiterhin als Archiv mit Beiträgen aus den Jahren 1996 – 2015 zur Verfügung.

Ethnische Vertreibung mit US-Hilfe? *

Von Carey L. Biron, Washington (IPS) *

Die USA und Großbritannien sehen sich derzeit mit Vorwürfen konfrontiert, Berichte äthiopischer Volksgruppen über Zwangsvertreibungen und Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Zuge großer Entwicklungsprojekte ignoriert, toleriert oder verharmlost zu haben.

Obwohl die US-Entwicklungsagentur USAID und ihr britisches Pendant DFID Untersuchungsmissionen zu den betroffenen Gemeinschaften entsandt haben, beharren Washington und London darauf, dass die Vorwürfe jeder Grundlage entbehrten. Die Hilfsagenturen selbst haben auf diesbezügliche IPS-Anfragen noch nicht reagiert.

Das Oakland Institute, eine Menschenrechtsorganisation mit Sitz in den USA, hat Mitschnitte der Treffen anlässlich der Missionen übersetzt und veröffentlicht. Aus den Berichten geht hervor, dass beide Entwicklungsagenturen sehr wohl über die massiven Übergriffe von Seiten der äthiopischen Regierung Bescheid wussten.

»Die Transkriptionen der Aufnahmen lassen keinen Zweifel daran, dass die Geberagenturen während ihrer Felduntersuchungen über schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen in Kenntnis gesetzt wurden. Doch sie zogen es vor, die Vorwürfe kategorisch zu ignorieren«, kritisiert Will Hurd, der Autor eines Berichts. Die Aufnahmen beinhalten Aussagen Betroffener gegenüber den Mitgliedern der Mission, die im Januar 2012 zum Unteren Omo-Tal im Südwesten Äthiopiens gereist war. »Sie belegen, dass die Delegationen eine Menge mitbekommen haben«, bestätigt Anuradhal Mittal, Geschäftsführerin des Oakland Institute. »Deren Geberregierungen müssen nun die Verantwortung für ihre Untätigkeit übernehmen und sich kritisch mit diesen fragwürdigen Entwicklungsstrategien auseinandersetzen.«

* Aus: neues deutschland, Dienstag, 23. Juli 2013


Press Release: Fingerprints of International Aid on Forced Relocation, Repression, and Human Rights Abuse in Ethiopia

Wednesday, July 17, 2013 **

OAKLAND, CA—Two new reports from the Oakland Institute, Development Aid to Ethiopia: Overlooking Violence, Marginalization, and Political Repression and Ignoring Abuse in Ethiopia: DFID and USAID in the Lower Omo Valley, show how Western development assistance is supporting forced evictions and massive violations of human rights in Ethiopia.

The Ethiopian government’s controversial “villagization” resettlement program to clear vast areas for large-scale land investments is funded largely by international development organizations. The first report, Development Aid to Ethiopia, establishes direct links between development aid--an average $3.5 billion a year, equivalent to 50 to 60% of Ethiopia’s national budget--and industrial projects that violate the human rights of people in the way of their implementation.

The report also shows how indirect support in the form of funding for infrastructure, such as dams for irrigation and electricity for planned plantations, plays a role in repressing local communities by making the projects viable.

Ethiopia is one of the largest recipients of US development aid in Africa, receiving an average of $800 million annually--even though the US State Department is well aware of widespread repression and civil rights violations. A strategically located military partner seen as a leader in the “African Renaissance,” Ethiopia is gently described as having a “democratic deficit” by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Yet this phrase does not begin to describe or justify the kind of routine violence and coercion taking place on the ground and documented in the Oakland Institute’s new report, Ignoring Abuse in Ethiopia: DFID and USAID in the Lower Omo Valley.

The massive resettlement of 260,000 people of many different ethnic groups in the Lower Omo Valley has been fraught with controversy and has set off an alarm among international human rights groups. Information around forced evictions, beatings, killings, rapes, imprisonment, intimidation and political coercion, has been shared, and these tactics have been documented as tools used in the resettlement process.

In response to allegations, DFID and USAID launched a joint investigation in January of 2012. After completing their visit, they came to the puzzling conclusion that allegations of human rights abuses were “unsubstantiated.” The contents of this new report, which include first-person accounts via transcripts of interviews that took place during the aid investigations last year, overwhelmingly contradict that finding and question the integrity of the inquiry.

The interviews paint a very different story from what DFID and USAID reportedly saw and witnessed, and for the first time are made available to the public here.

“[The soldiers] went all over the place, and they took the wives of the Bodi and raped them, raped them, raped them, raped them. Then they came and they raped our wives, here,” said one Mursi man interviewed during the investigation. Another man added: “the Ethiopian government is saying they are going to collect us all and put us in a resettlement site in the forest. We are going to have to stay there. What are the cattle going to eat there? They are our cattle, which we live from. They are our ancestor’s cattle, which we live from. If we stay out there in the forest, what are they going to eat?”

It is worrisome that aid agencies rubber stamp development projects that are violating human rights. Worse, they have chosen to ignore the results of their own investigations.

“Bottom line, our research shows unequivocally that current violent and controversial forced resettlement programs of mostly minority groups in Ethiopia have US and UK aid fingerprints all over them,” said Anuradha Mittal, Executive Director of the Oakland Institute. “It’s up to the officials involved to swiftly reexamine their role and determine how to better monitor funding if they are indeed not in favor of violence and repression as suitable relocation techniques for the development industry,” she continued.

** Quelle: http://www.oaklandinstitute.org; Wednesday, July 17, 2013


Zurück zur Äthiopien-Seite

Zur Entwicklungspolitik-Seite

Zurück zur Homepage